From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Village of Potsdam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 1945
269 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

September 19, 1945.


The only question presented is identical with that in McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs ( 269 App. Div. 469). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., concur on the authority of McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs ( 269 App. Div. 469) ; Hill, P.J., concurs on such authority and upon Bernardine v. City of New York ( 294 N.Y. 361). [See post, p. 1005.]


Summaries of

Young v. Village of Potsdam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 19, 1945
269 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Young v. Village of Potsdam

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT W. YOUNG, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF POTSDAM, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Sofka v. State of New York

) In the meantime the Legislature, in a general revision of the Court of Claims Act, had incorporated the…

Jones v. City of Rochester

Memorandum: At the time of the assault Boryszewski was acting within the scope of his employment as a police…