From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Tompkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1986
124 A.D.2d 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

November 10, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and defendant's motion granted. Memorandum: It was an abuse of discretion for the court to excuse plaintiff's failure to comply with defendant's demand to file the note of issue (CPLR 3216). To defeat the motion, a party must show a "justifiable excuse for the delay and a good and meritorious cause of action" (CPLR 3216 [e]). Plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merits and counsel's inability to locate his client for some two years does not constitute a justifiable excuse for the delay (Highlands Ins. Co. v Maddena Constr. Co., 109 A.D.2d 1071; see also, Abrams, Kochman, Rathskeller v Esquire Motels, 79 A.D.2d 879). Under these circumstances, the motion to dismiss should have been granted (Salch v Paratore, 60 N.Y.2d 851; Walker v Town of Lockport, 109 A.D.2d 1102, affd 65 N.Y.2d 840).


Summaries of

Young v. Tompkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1986
124 A.D.2d 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Young v. Tompkins

Case Details

Full title:MERRILL A. YOUNG, Respondent, v. STRATTON TOMPKINS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Franck v. CNY Anesthesia Group

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum:…