From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Sunderman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1934
189 N.E. 728 (N.Y. 1934)

Opinion

Submitted December 5, 1933

Decided January 9, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel ( J. Joseph Lilly and Charles E. Ramsgate of counsel), for appellant.

J. Leonard Stoll for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Young v. Sunderman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1934
189 N.E. 728 (N.Y. 1934)
Case details for

Young v. Sunderman

Case Details

Full title:HARRY YOUNG, Respondent, v. THEODORE A. SUNDERMAN, as Acting Property…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 9, 1934

Citations

189 N.E. 728 (N.Y. 1934)
189 N.E. 728

Citing Cases

Young v. Sunderman

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 263 N.Y.…

Mills Novelty Co. v. Sunderman

On the contrary, the allegations disclose merely a dispute about a possessory right in specific chattels,…