From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 20, 2004
131 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 83473

April 20, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Honorable Keith M. Sutherland

Donald Lee Young Crossroads Correctional Center, (Pro Se), Cameron, MO, for appellant.

Andrea Kaye Spillars, Breck K. Burgess, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary R. Russell, J.



ORDER


Donald Lee Young appeals the judgment dismissing his "Motion To Reopen Rule 27.26 Post Conviction Motion Pursuant To Rule 27.26 Sub-Sections (c) (d)." We previously affirmed his conviction for rape, State v. Young, 668 S.W.2d 263 (Mo. App. 1984), and affirmed the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief, Young v. State, 841 S.W.2d 776 (Mo. App. 1992). He now seeks to raise allegedly newly discovered grounds for post conviction relief.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 20, 2004
131 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD LEE YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 20, 2004

Citations

131 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)