From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Schoemehl

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
May 5, 1998
972 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 72895, 72885.

OPINION FILED: May 5, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 8, 1998. Application for Transfer Denied August 25, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ROBERT LEE CAMPBELL, JUDGE.

Robert Schultz, St. Louis, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

John M. Hessel, Thomas P. Berra, Jr., Paul J. Schulte, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.

Before Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, JJ.


ORDER


Plaintiff filed a two-count petition against defendants alleging breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. Defendants' filed a summary judgment motion, which the trial court granted. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Young v. Schoemehl

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
May 5, 1998
972 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Young v. Schoemehl

Case Details

Full title:JAMES YOUNG, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. DENNIS SCHOEMEHL AND JOHN McHUGH…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: May 5, 1998

Citations

972 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)