From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Foster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00913-BNB (D. Colo. May. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00913-BNB

05-17-2013

TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. COUNSELOR FOSTER, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Timothy Doyle Young, is in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons and currently is incarcerated at ADX in Florence, Colorado. Originally, Mr. Young, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a habeas petition in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois (Southern District of Illinois). The Southern District of Illinois transferred the action to this Court pursuant to § 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1404(a).

In an order entered on April 10, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland instructed Mr. Young to submit his claims on a Court-approved form used in filing prisoner complaints. Mr. Young also was instructed to submit to the Court a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the six months prior to the filing of the instant action, if he desired to proceed in forma pauperis. Otherwise, he was directed to pay the $350.00 filing fee prior to proceeding in this action.

After review of Mr. Young's pleadings, the Court agrees that his claims properly are asserted in a prisoner complaint. Mr. Young has failed since the April 10 Order to communicate with the Court. As a result, he has failed to submit his claims on a Court-approved form used in filing prisoner complaints and failed either to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full or to submit a proper 28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion and Affidavit along with a certified trust fund account statement for the six months preceding the filing date of this action within the time allowed. The action, therefore, will be dismissed.

The Court also certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Young files a notice of appeal he must pay the full $455.00 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(b) for failure to comply with the April 10, 2013 Order and cure deficiencies. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 17th day of May, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

__________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Young v. Foster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00913-BNB (D. Colo. May. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. COUNSELOR FOSTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 17, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00913-BNB (D. Colo. May. 17, 2013)

Citing Cases

Young v. United States

3) (civil complaint; transfer from S.D. Ind.; dismissed for failure to use forms and provide statement);…