Opinion
Equity No. 2955.
April 6, 1962, Decided
Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Newport, David Hartfiled, Jr., David W. Wallace, New York City, for complainant.
DeSimone & DeSimone, Florie DeSimone, Herbert F. DeSimone, Providence, Friedman & Friedman, Hyman R. Friedman, William K. Friedman, New York City, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
After our opinion herein 179 A.2d 107, was filed, the respondents by permission of the court presented a motion for leave to reargue setting forth therein certain reasons on which they base their contention that justice requires a reargument of the cause.
We have carefully considered those reasons and are of the opinion that they are not based on any matter which was not fully considered and passed upon directly or indirectly directly by at in reaching the conclusion stated in our opinion.
The motion is denied, and on April 16, 1962 the parties may present to this court for our approval a form of decree, in accordance with our orgininal opinion, to be entered in the superior court.