From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Collier

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 31, 2007
252 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6475.

Submitted: October 10, 2007.

Decided: October 31, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:03-cv-3640).

Robert E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., John Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole Pardon Service, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Robert E. Young appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Young v. Collier; No. 6:03-cv-3640, 2006 WL 2706965 (D.S.C. September 19, 2006 Mar. 23, 2007). Further, we deny Young's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Young v. Collier

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 31, 2007
252 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Young v. Collier

Case Details

Full title:Robert E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neil COLLIER, Probation Officer…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 2007

Citations

252 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Bolick v. Tomkins

and then further . . . ensure that the statutory safeguards have been followed.” Id.; see Young v. Collier,…

Bolick v. Thompson

At bottom, qualified immunity is better left to be determined at the summary judgment stage. Defendants cite…