From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yost v. Gunby

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 9, 1965
145 S.E.2d 575 (Ga. 1965)

Opinion

23182.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 9, 1965.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1965. REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 29, 1965.

Appellate procedure. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Moore.

Benjamin D. Garner, G. Seals Aiken, for appellants.

Huie, Etheridge Harland, W. Stell Huie, Harold Sheats, John Tye Ferguson, George P. Dillard, Herbert O. Edwards, Robert E. Mozley, Henry L. Bowden, John E. Daugherty, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Paul L. Hanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Homer M. Stark, Hope D. Stark, for party at interest not party to record.


In this case the appellants filed their enumeration of errors 19 days after the appeal was docketed in this court. Hence, the case is controlled by Stanford v. Evans, Reed Williams, 221 Ga. 331, which held that an enumeration of errors filed more than 15 days after the appeal was docketed in this court was not timely.

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur, except Mobley, J., not participating for providential cause.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 9, 1965 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1965 — REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 29, 1965.


Summaries of

Yost v. Gunby

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 9, 1965
145 S.E.2d 575 (Ga. 1965)
Case details for

Yost v. Gunby

Case Details

Full title:YOST et al. v. GUNBY, Ordinary, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 9, 1965

Citations

145 S.E.2d 575 (Ga. 1965)
221 Ga. 552

Citing Cases

Undercofler v. McLennan

The record discloses that this appeal was docketed on September 28, 1965, and the enumeration of errors was…

Smith v. Smith

3. It follows, therefore, that, even though the order in the present case extending the time for filing the…