Opinion
10 Civ. 7254 (JCF)
03-26-2012
(ECF)
OPINION
AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The plaintiffs in this case bring claims for unpaid wages, overtime, and spread of hours pay pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (the "FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and New York Labor Law against their former employer, Wai ? Café Inc. ("Wai ? Café"), and its owner, Wai Yin Chan. The parties consented to proceed before me for all purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and agreed to try liability issues to a jury, reserving for me the calculation of damages. Shortly before trial, defendants' counsel was relieved, and Mr. Chan proceeded to trial pro se. Because the corporate defendant failed to appear by counsel at trial, it was held to be in default. Plaintiff Yong Kui Chen did not attend the trial, and his claims were therefore dismissed. The claims of Jian Hui Lin, who was not named in the original Complaint, but who had submitted a form indicating his consent to sue under the FLSA, were submitted to the jury.
The trial was held on February 6 and 7, 2012. At the close of the evidence, the jury was asked to make liability determinations with respect to each of the plaintiffs' claims and to make factual findings that would serve as the basis for calculating damages.
Liability
A threshold issue in any FLSA case is whether the plaintiffs are "covered" employees under the statute. "The FLSA minimum-wage and overtime provisions apply only to employees who are (1) personally engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce (so-called 'individual coverage'), or (2) [were] employed in an enterprise engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce (so-called 'enterprise coverage')." Garcia v. Serpe, No. 3:08cv1662, 2012 WL 380253, at *4 (D. Conn. Feb. 6, 2012) (alteration in original) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Here, the plaintiffs never contended that they personally performed work related to the production of goods transported across state lines, so individual coverage is not triggered. To establish enterprise coverage, the plaintiffs must demonstrate that the employees "engage in commerce or handle, sell, or otherwise work on goods and materials that have been moved in commerce, and [] the enterprise has at least $500,000 in annual gross volume of sales made or business done." Solis v. Cindy's Total Care, Inc., No. 10 Civ. 7242, 2012 WL 28141, at *15 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2012) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 203(s)(1)). At trial, the jury found that the plaintiffs had not shown that Wai ? Café's annual gross receipts exceeded $500,000.00. The FLSA claims must therefore be dismissed.
Nevertheless, I will retain supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' claims under New York Labor Law. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, a federal district court that has original jurisdiction over a civil action may also exercise jurisdiction over other claims unless certain exceptions apply. Where all federal claims are dismissed prior to trial, it is generally appropriate to dismiss without prejudice any state claims. See Motorola Credit Corp. v. Uzan, 388 F.3d 39, 56 (2d Cir. 2004). However, where the parties and the court have expended substantial resources in preparation for trial, and particularly where a case has actually been tried, it is appropriate to retain jurisdiction over state claims even when the federal claims are dismissed. See id. (approving exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over state claims tried in conjunction with federal claims that were subsequently dismissed); Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension Fund, 81 F.3d 1181, 1191-92 (2d Cir. 1996) (allowing supplemental jurisdiction where case had proceeded for more than a year and federal claims were dismissed only nine days before scheduled trial); Purgess v. Sharrock, 33 F.3d 134, 138 (2d Cir. 1994) (where dismissal of federal claim occurs "late in the action, after there has been substantial expenditure in time, effort, and money in preparing the dependent claims, knocking them down with a belated rejection of supplemental jurisdiction may not be fair. Nor is it by any means necessary.").
This is such a case. The parties completed discovery, submitted the pretrial order, and tried a case in which the federal and state claims were based on the same constellation of facts. In such circumstances, the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state claims is warranted.
With respect to the remaining liability issues, the jury concluded that each plaintiff had been denied the appropriate minimum wage, overtime, and spread of hours pay. The jury also found, however, that Mr. Chan had not acted willfully, thus precluding the plaintiffs from an award of liquidated damages. N.Y. Labor Law § 663(1).
Damages
Following trial, the parties were invited to submit proposed damages calculations based on the jury's findings as to the periods of time each plaintiff worked, the hours that plaintiff worked each week, and the amount he was actually paid. The plaintiffs made such a submission, and also indicated that they were waiving any claim for attorneys' fees. (Letter of C.K. Lee dated Feb. 14, 2012 ("Pl. Damages Statement")). Mr. Chan did not file a response. The following determinations constitute my findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The formulas used to calculate damages are the same for each plaintiff. The unpaid minimum wage ("MW") is equal to the difference between the prevailing minimum wage minus the plaintiff's actual rate of pay (the "paid rate") multiplied by the number of hours worked in a week up to forty hours multiplied by the number of weeks worked in the relevant period. The overtime ("OT") owed is the difference between one and one-half times the minimum wage and the paid rate multiplied by the number of hours over forty multiplied by the number of weeks worked. Finally, the unpaid spread of hours ("SH") equals the number of days worked over ten hours multiplied by the minimum wage multiplied by the number of weeks. Based on this framework, the damages for each plaintiff are as follows:
A. Zu Ghang Zhu
1. September 2004 - December 2004
Number of weeks worked 17.2 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 1.77) x (40) x (17.2) = $2,325.44 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 1.77) x (39) x (17.2) = $3,997.97 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (17.2) = $575.77 Total = $6,899.18
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
2. January 2005 - December 2005
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.00 - 1.77) x (40) x (52) = $8,798.40 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($9.00 - 1.77) x (39) x (52) = $14,662.44 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.00) x (52) = $2,028.00 Total = $25,488.84
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
3. January 2006 - December 2006
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.75 - 1.77) x (40) x (52) = $10,358.40 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.13 - 1.77) x (39) x (52) = $16,954.08 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.75) x (52) = $2,281.50 Total = $29,593.98
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
4. February 2007 - April 2007
Number of weeks worked 13 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 1.77) x (40) x (13) = $2,797.60 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 1.77) x (39) x (13) = $4,542.72 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($7.15) x (13) = $604.18 Total = $7,944.50
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
5. May 2008 - July 23, 2009
Number of weeks worked 59.6 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 2.91) x (40) x (59.6) = $10,108.16 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 2.91) x (32) x (59.6) = $14,914.30 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.15) x (59.6) = $2,556.84 Total = $27,579.30
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $900/month
Paid rate $2.91/hr.
6. July 24, 2009 - December 2009
Number of weeks worked 23.8 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 2.91) x (40) x (23.8) = $4,131.68 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 2.91) x (32) x (23.8) = $6,069.95 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (23.8) = $1,035.30 Total = $11,236.93
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $900/month
Paid rate $2.91/hr.
7. January 2010 - August 2010
Number of weeks worked 34.4 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 3.23) x (40) x (34.4) = $5,531.52 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 3.23) x (32) x (34.4) = $8,421.12 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (34.4) = $1,496.40 Total = $15,449.04
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,000/month
Paid rate $3.23/hr.
Zu Ghang Zhu Total = $124,191.77
B. Hao Chen
1. December 2003
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 1.77) x (40) x (4.3) = $581.36 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 1.77) x (39) x (4.3) = $999.49 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,724.79
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
2. January 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 1.91) x (40) x (4.3) = $557.28 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 1.91) x (39) x (4.3) = $976.01 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,677.23
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $650/month
Paid rate $1.91/hr.
3. February 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.06) x (40) x (4.3) = $531.48 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.06) x (39) x (4.3) = $950.86 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,626.28
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $700/month
Paid rate $2.06/hr.
4. March 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.21) x (40) x (4.3) = $505.68 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.21) x (39) x (4.3) = $925.70 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,575.32
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $750/month
Paid rate $2.21/hr.
5. April 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.36) x (40) x (4.3) = $479.88 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.34) x (39) x (4.3) = $900.55 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,524.37
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $800/month
Paid rate $2.36/hr.
The plaintiffs incorrectly calculated the hourly rate at $2.34.
6. May 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.50) x (40) x (4.3) = $455.80 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.50) x (39) x (4.3) = $877.07 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,476.81
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $850/month
Paid rate $2.50/hr.
7. June 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.65) x (40) x (4.3) = $430.00 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.65) x (39) x (4.3) = $851.92 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,425.86
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $900/month
Paid rate $2.65/hr.
8. July 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.80) x (40) x (4.3) = $404.20 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.80) x (39) x (4.3) = $826.76 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,374.90
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $950/month
Paid rate $2.80/hr.
9. August 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 2.94) x (40) x (4.3) = $380.12 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 2.94) x (39) x (4.3) = $803.28 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,327.34
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,000/month
Paid rate $2.94/hr.
10. September 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 3.09) x (40) x (4.3) = $354.32 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 3.09) x (39) x (4.3) = $778.13 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,276.39
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1.050/month
Paid rate $3.09/hr.
11. October 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 3.24) x (40) x (4.3) = $328.52 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 3.24) x (39) x (4.3) = $752.97 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,225.43
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,100/month
Paid rate $3.24/hr.
12. November 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 3.39) x (40) x (4.3) = $302.72 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 3.39) x (39) x (4.3) = $727.82 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,174.48
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,150/month
Paid rate $3.39/hr.
13. December 2004
Number of weeks worked 4.3 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($5.15 - 3.53) x (40) x (4.3) = $278.64 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($7.73 - 3.53) x (39) x (4.3) = $704.34 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($5.15) x (4.3) = $143.94 Total = $1,126.92
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,200/month
Paid rate $3.53/hr.
14. January 2005 - December 2005
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.00 - 3.53) x (40) x (52) = $5,137.60 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($9.00 - 3.53) x (39) x (52) = $11,093.16 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.00) x (52) = $2,028.00 Total = $18,258.76
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,200/month
Paid rate $3.53/hr.
15. January 2006 - December 2006
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.75 - 3.53) x (40) x (52) = $6,697.60 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.13 - 3.53) x (39) x (52) = $13,384.80 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.75) x (52) = $2,281.50 Total = $22,363.90
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,200/month
Paid rate $3.53/hr.
16. January 2007 - April 2007
Number of weeks worked 17.2 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 3.53) x (40) x (17.2) = $2,490.56 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 3.53) x (39) x (17.2) = $4,829.76 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($7.15) x (17.2) = $799.37 Total = $8,119.69
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,200/month
Paid rate $3.53/hr.
17. May 2008 - December 2008
Number of weeks worked 34.4 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 4.52) x (40) x (34.4) = $3,618.88 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 4.52) x (32) x (34.4) = $6,635.97 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.15) x (34.4) = $1,475.76 Total = $11,730.61
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,400/month
Paid rate $4.52/hr.
The plaintiffs incorrectly state this figure as 39 hours here and also for the next two periods.
18. January 2009 - July 23, 2009
Number of weeks worked 29 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 4.65) x (40) x (29) = $2,900.00 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 4.65) x (20) x (29) = $3,526.40 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.15) x (29) = $1,244.10 Total = $7,670.50
Hours worked/week 60 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,200/month
Paid rate $4.65/hr.
19. July 24, 2009 - August 2010
Number of weeks worked 53 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 4.65) x (40) x (53) = $5,512.00 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 4.65) x (20) x (53) = $6,603.80 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (53) = $2,305.50 Total = $14,421.30
Hours worked/week 60 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $1,200/month
Paid rate $4.65/hr.
Hao Chen Total = $101,100.88
C. You Huang Zhu
1. December 2008 - July 23, 2009
Number of weeks worked 33.4 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 2.26) x (40) x (33.4) = $6,533.04 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 2.26) x (32) x (33.4) = $9,052.74 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.15) x (33.4) = $1,432.86 Total = $17,018.64
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $700/month
Paid rate $2.26/hr.
2. July 24, 2009 - December 2009
Number of weeks worked 22.5 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 2.26) x (40) x (22.5) = $4,491.00 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 2.26) x (32) x (22.5) = $6,206.40 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (22.5) = $978.75 Total = $11,676.15
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $700/month
Paid rate $2.26/hr.
3. January 2010 - August 2010
Number of weeks worked 34.4 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 2.91) x (40) x (34.4) = $5,971.84 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 2.91) x (32) x (34.4) = $8,773.38 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (34.4) = $1,496.40 Total = $16,241.62
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $900/month
Paid rate $2.91/hr.
You Huang Zhu Total = $44,936.41
D. Shui Bing Zhu
1. January 2006 - December 2006
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.75 - 1.77) x (40) x (52) = $10,358.40 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.13 - 1.77) x (39) x (52) = $16,954.08 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.75) x (52) = $2,281.50 Total = $29,593.98
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
2. January 2007 - February 2008
Number of weeks worked 60.6 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 1.77) x (40) x (60.6) = $13,041.12 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 1.77) x (39) x (60.6) = $21,176.06 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($7.15) x (60.6) = $2,816.39 Total = $37,033.57
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
3. May 2008 - July 23, 2009
Number of weeks worked 64 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 2.26) x (40) x (64) = $12,518.40 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 2.26) x (32) x (64) = $17,346.56 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.15) x (64) = $2,745.60 Total = $32,610.56
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $700/month
Paid rate $2.26/hr.
4. July 24, 2009 - March 2010
Number of weeks worked 35.4 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 2.26) x (40) x (35.4) = $7,065.84 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 2.26) x (32) x (35.4) = $9,764.74 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (35.4) = $1,539.90 Total = $18,370.38
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $700/month
Paid rate $2.26/hr.
Shui Bing Zhu Total = $117,608.49
E. Guo Ren Huang
1. May 2008 - August 2008
Number of weeks worked 17.2 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 2.26) x (40) x (17.2) = $3,364.32 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 2.26) x (32) x (17.2) = $4,661.89 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.15) x (17.2) = $737.88 Total = $8,764.09
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $700/month
Paid rate $2.26/hr.
2. September 2009 - August 2010
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.25 - 2.91) x (40) x (52) = $9,027.20 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.88 - 2.91) x (32) x (52) = $13,262.08 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6) x ($7.25) x (52) = $2,262.00 Total = 24,551.28
Hours worked/week 72 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $900/month
Paid rate $2.91/hr.
Guo Ren Huang Total = $33,315.37
F. Jian Hui Lin
1. April 2005 - December 2005Unpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.00 - 1.77) x (40) x (38.7) = $6,548.04 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($9.00 - 1.77) x (39) x (38.7)
Number of weeks worked 38.7 weeks
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
= $10,912.24 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.00) x (38.7) = $1,509.30 Total = $18,969.58
2. January 2006 - December 2006
Number of weeks worked 52 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($6.75 - 1.77) x (40) x (52) = $10,358.40 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.13 - 1.77) x (39) x (52) = $16,954.08 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($6.75) x (52) = $2,281.50 Total = $29,593.98
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
3. January 2007 - April 2007
Number of weeks worked 17.2 weeksUnpaid MW = (MW - Paid Rate) x (40 hours) x (Number of weeks) = ($7.15 - 1.77) x (40) x (17.2) = $3,701.44 Unpaid OT = (1.5MW - Paid Rate) x (Hours over 40) x (# weeks) = ($10.73 - 1.77) x (39) x (17.2)
Hours worked/week 79 hrs./wk.
Monthly salary $600/month
Paid rate $1.77/hr.
= $6,010.37 Unpaid SH = (days worked over 10 hrs.) x (MW) x (# weeks) = (6.5) x ($7.15) x (17.2) = $799.37 Total = $10,511.18
Jian Hui Lin Total = $59,074.74
Conclusion
Judgment shall be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants Wai ? Café Inc. and Wai Yin Chan, jointly and severally, on the plaintiffs' New York Labor Law claims as set forth below;
+--------------------------+ ¦Plaintiff ¦Amount ¦ +--------------+-----------¦ ¦Zu Ghang Zhu ¦$124,191.77¦ +--------------+-----------¦ ¦Hao Chen ¦$101,100.88¦ +--------------+-----------¦ ¦You Huang Zhu ¦$44,936,41 ¦ +--------------+-----------¦ ¦Shui Bing Zhu ¦$117,608.49¦ +--------------+-----------¦ ¦Guo Ren Huang ¦&33,35.37 ¦ +--------------+-----------¦ ¦Jian Hui Lin ¦$59,074.74 ¦ +--------------------------+
The plaintiffs' claims under the FLSA are dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.
The plaintiffs request that I "reapportion" the costs of the interpreter who translated for both the plaintiffs and Mr. Chan at trial. (Pl. Damages Statement). This application is moot; as the prevailing parties, the plaintiffs are entitled to costs, and interpreter expenses are included among taxable costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1920(6).
--------
SO ORDERED.
________________________
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: New York, New York
Copies mailed this date to:
C.K. Lee, Esq.
Robert L. Kraselnik, Esq.
Kraselnik & Lee, PLLC
30 East 39th Street, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10016
Wai Yin Chan
54 Lyman Ave.
Staten Island, New York 10305