From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yehowshua v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 20, 2000
773 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

reversing and remanding sentence imposing life imprisonment as both an HFO and PRR

Summary of this case from Brown v. State

Opinion

No. 4D00-339.

Opinion filed December 20, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; James I. Cohn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-20177 CF10.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Appellant, Yisrael Yehowshua (Yehowshua), was convicted of burglary with a battery and indecent assault of a child under sixteen years of age. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment as both a habitual felony offender (HFO) and a prison releasee reoffender (PRR). We affirm his convictions, but reverse his sentence imposing both the HFO and PRR sentences.

In Grant v. State, No. SC99-164, 2000 WL 1637539, at *3 (Fla. Nov. 2, 2000), the Florida Supreme Court found that "the imposition of anapplicable longer, concurrent term of imprisonment with a PRR mandatory minimum sentence does not violate double jeopardy." However, the Grant court cited with approval Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), where the First District found that the trial court erred in entering two concurrent, equal sentences. The First District found there was error not because such sentencing violated double jeopardy, but because it was not authorized by the PRR Act.

Because section 775.082(8)(c) only authorizes the court to deviate from the prison releasee reoffender sentencing scheme to impose a greater sentence of incarceration, and because a life term under the habitual felony offender statute is not greater than a life term under the prison releasee reoffender statute, the trial court was without authority to sentence appellant under the habitual felony offender statute.

Id. at 734.

Accordingly, we find that the trial court erred in sentencing Yehowshua as both an HFO and a PRR, and reverse and remand with directions for the trial court to sentence him only as a PRR.

Gunther, Polen and Stevenson, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Yehowshua v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 20, 2000
773 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

reversing and remanding sentence imposing life imprisonment as both an HFO and PRR

Summary of this case from Brown v. State
Case details for

Yehowshua v. State

Case Details

Full title:YISRAEL YEHOWSHUA a/k/a KENNETH N. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 20, 2000

Citations

773 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Weire v. State

Id. at 658 (citing section 775.082(8)(c), Florida Statutes (1997)). See also Yehowshua v. State, No.…

Underhill v. State

We find no abuse of discretion in the admission of the photographs. As for Underhill's sentence, while the…