From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yearwood v. Yearwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1976
54 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 7, 1976


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 14, 1976, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion and the interest of justice, and the matter remanded to Trial Term, Bronx County, with a direction to appoint counsel to represent defendant-appellant wife in the action without charge for that service, without costs and without disbursements. Appellant's complete indigency is established, and she is undoubtedly a "poor person" (CPLR 1101, subd [a]). In the circumstances, counsel should have been assigned in accordance with the Bar's traditional responsibility "to willingly accept assignments * * * to help those who cannot afford financially to help themselves." (Jacox v Jacox, 43 A.D.2d 716, 717.) We have recognized this principle by our decision in Motion 1798 of 1974, Duplessi v Duplessi (NYLJ, June 6, 1974, p 2, col 3). The appointment of counsel shall be without prejudice to an application at Special Term for an award of counsel fee to be paid by the husband to the wife.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Birns, Silverman and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Yearwood v. Yearwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1976
54 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Yearwood v. Yearwood

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL YEARWOOD, Respondent, v. NILDA YEARWOOD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Medina v. Medina

Appellant's indigency is clearly established on this record, sufficient to conclude that she is a "poor…

Matter of Enrique R

CPLR 1102 (a) permits the assignment of counsel where leave has been granted to proceed as a poor person. On…