From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yassin v. Sarabu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued May 22, 2001.

June 25, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Westchester County Health Care Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated August 23, 2000, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) on the ground that the action was time-barred.

Schiavetti, Corgan, Soscia, DiEdwards and Nicholson, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Michael N. Romano of counsel), for appellant.

Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Cannavo, P.C., New York, N Y (Marie Ng, Stephen C. Glasser, and Stefanie R. Cardarelli of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The doctrine of estoppel will be applied against governmental agencies only in exceptional cases (see, Zaimand v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 186 A.D.2d 555). A municipality may be estopped from asserting that a claim was untimely filed when its improper conduct induced reliance by a plaintiff who changed his or her position to his or her detriment (see, Matter of Griffith v. Staten Is. Rapid Transp. Operating Auth., 269 A.D.2d 596, 597; Bender v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 38 N.Y.2d 662).

Here, the conduct of the defendant Westchester County Health Care Corporation did not warrant the application of the doctrine of estoppel (see, Matter of Quintero v. Town of Babylon Indus. Dev. Agency, 172 A.D.2d 527). Only a showing of fraud, misrepresentation, deception, or similar affirmative misconduct, along with reasonable reliance thereon, will justify the imposition of estoppel (see, DeGori v. Long Is. R. R., 202 A.D.2d 549; Gallo v. County of Westchester, 162 A.D.2d 584; Graber v. City of New York, 89 A.D.2d 598). Accordingly, the motion should have been granted.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, FEUERSTEIN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Yassin v. Sarabu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Yassin v. Sarabu

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMED YASSIN, ET AL., respondents, v. MOHAN ROY SARABU, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 620

Citing Cases

Mohl v. Town of Riverhead

"[A] municipality may be estopped from asserting plaintiffs noncompliance with a notice of claim statute" (…

In re City of N.Y. Rel, to Acqu. Title

( Granada Bldgs. v City of Kingston, 58 NY2d 705, 708, rearg denied 58 NY2d 825). "Only a showing of fraud,…