From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yasinosky v. Lenio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 2006
28 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-05484.

April 18, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), entered May 5, 2005, which, upon an order of the same court dated March 7, 2005, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

Reynolds, Caronia, Gianelli, Hagney, LaPinta Hargraves, LLP, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Anthony LaPinta of counsel), for appellant.

James P. Nunemaker, Jr., Associates (Rivkin Radler, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. [Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, and Melissa M. Murphy] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of negligence by the plaintiff based on the deposition testimony of the parties that the motor vehicle accident occurred when the plaintiff exited a driveway and made an unexpected left turn across the defendant's lane of travel in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1143 ( see Ferrara v. Castro, 283 AD2d 392). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. He merely alleged, unsupported by any competent evidence, that the defendant somehow contributed to the cause of the accident ( see Ferrara v. Castro, supra; Rak v. Kossakowski, 24 AD3d 1191). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.


Summaries of

Yasinosky v. Lenio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 2006
28 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Yasinosky v. Lenio

Case Details

Full title:FRANK YASINOSKY, Appellant, v. ANNEMARIE LENIO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2881
812 N.Y.S.2d 367

Citing Cases

Young v. Serino

The plaintiff has therefore established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law as to the…

Rost v. Stolzman

Consequently, although "`[n]egligence cases . . . do not usually lend themselves to summary judgment'" (…