From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yarrington v. Baldwin Manor, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 7, 1972
60 N.J. 169 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1972 —

Decided February 7, 1972.

On certification to the Appellate Division ( 59 N.J. 273 (1971)).

Mr. Matthew M. Keshishian argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Krugman, Chapnick, Grimshaw Dubow, attorneys).

Mr. Edward E. Kuebler argued cause for the respondents.


The Appellate Division concluded that since there had been no damage during the period of the policy its coverage did not, under its explicit terms, extend to the occurrence set forth in the third party complaint. The particular record before us would not fairly permit any other conclusion and accordingly the Appellate Division's judgment is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Yarrington v. Baldwin Manor, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 7, 1972
60 N.J. 169 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

Yarrington v. Baldwin Manor, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY YARRINGTON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. BALDWIN MANOR, INC., NICHOLAS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 7, 1972

Citations

60 N.J. 169 (N.J. 1972)
286 A.2d 711

Citing Cases

Kelly, Etc. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co.

[Hartford Acc. Indem. Co. v. Aetna Life Cas. Ins. Co., 98 N.J. 18, 27 (1984) ( quoting Muller Fuel Oil Co. v.…

Williams v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Deodato v. Hartford Ins. Co., 143 N.J. Super. 396 (Law Div. 1976). Cf. Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of No.…