From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yang v. Korea First Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 1998
247 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

finding that plaintiff's present claims of fraud and malfeasance were barred by res judicata because they could have been, but were not, raised as a defense in the prior foreclosure action

Summary of this case from Moise v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (In re Moise)

Opinion

Decided February 10, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


Defendant-respondent bank obtained a default judgment against plaintiffs in a Queens County Supreme Court foreclosure action. That court thereafter denied two motions by plaintiffs to vacate the default judgment and for leave to file an answer to the complaint, in which motions plaintiffs blamed their defaults on the ineffectiveness of prior counsel and argued that the bank had been negligent in releasing proceeds of their construction loan to the contractor, without having in place controls ensuring that the contractor, who is not amenable to suit, had performed the work. Plaintiffs abandoned their appeal from the first Queens County order and commenced the instant action asserting, as against the bank, claims of fraud and malfeasance in the administration of their mortgage loan. The IAS Court correctly dismissed on res judicata grounds. New York's permissive counterclaim rule does not allow a party "to remain silent in an action in which he is the defendant and then bring a second action seeking relief inconsistent with the judgment in the first action by asserting what is simply a new legal theory" (Modell Co. v. Minister of Refm. Prot. Dutch Church, 68 N.Y.2d 456, 461; cf., Classic Autos. v. Oxford Resources Corp., 204 A.D.2d 209). Thus plaintiffs' present claim is barred by res judicata because it could have been raised as a defense in the first action, and would, if recognized, "destroy or impair the `rights * * * established by the first [action]'" (supra, at 461; see, Robbins v. Growney, 229 A.D.2d 356). We have considered plaintiffs' other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Yang v. Korea First Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 1998
247 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

finding that plaintiff's present claims of fraud and malfeasance were barred by res judicata because they could have been, but were not, raised as a defense in the prior foreclosure action

Summary of this case from Moise v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (In re Moise)

In Dae Yang, the Court affirmed the dismissal of a complaint for fraud and malfeasance in the administration of a mortgage as barred by res judicata where plaintiff could have raised the claims in the complaint as a defense in an earlier action, the foreclosure proceeding.

Summary of this case from SSJ Dev. of Sheepshead Bay I, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank
Case details for

Yang v. Korea First Bank

Case Details

Full title:SE DAE YANG et al., Appellants, v. KOREA FIRST BANK, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 363

Citing Cases

Moise v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (In re Moise)

Claims involving the same subject matter as prior claims that were litigated to judgment on the merits must…

Holmes v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (In re Holmes)

osure Action.") (internal citations omitted); Gray v. Bankers Trust Co. of Albany, N.A., 442 N.Y.S.2d 610,…