Opinion
February 16, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff established that there are issues of fact as to whether the appellants, who were responsible for snow and ice removal in the area where the plaintiff slipped and fell, had actual or constructive notice of the alleged icy condition, or had contributed to its creation. Accordingly, the appellants' motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see, e.g., Blake v. City of Albany, 48 N.Y.2d 875, 877; Rogers v. Dorchester Assocs., 32 N.Y.2d 553, 559; Kyung Sook Park v. Caesar Chemists, 245 A.D.2d 425; Jiuz v. City of New York, 244 A.D.2d 298; Kotopoulos v. Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 A.D.2d 276; Farrell v. Prentice, 206 A.D.2d 799; Glick v. City of New York, 139 A.D.2d 402).
Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.