From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yaites v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Nov 9, 2005
No. 10-05-00074-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2005)

Opinion

No. 10-05-00074-CR

Opinion delivered and filed November 9, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal fromthe Criminal District Court No. 3, Tarrant County, Texas, Trial Court No. 0912020D. Affirmed.

Before Cheif Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and, Justice REYNA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Christopher Yaites pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery without the benefit of a plea agreement. The court assessed Yaites's punishment at forty-five years' imprisonment. Yaites's counsel filed an Anders brief contending that this appeal presents no issues of arguable merit. Yaites has not filed a pro se brief or other response, though he was notified of his right to do so. Because our independent review of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, we will affirm the judgment. The documents Yaites signed in connection with his guilty plea provided him the admonishments required by law. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 1.14 (Vernon 2005), art. 26.13 (Vernon Supp. 2005). The court reviewed these admonishments on the record with Yaites, though not in the same level of detail. Yaites waived his right to a jury trial in writing. Id. art. 1.15 (Vernon 2005). Yaites signed a judicial confession and admitted in his testimony that he committed the offense alleged. See Dinnery v. State, 592 S.W.2d 343, 353 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979); Ramirez v. State, 139 S.W.3d 731, 732-33 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref'd). Yaites's trial counsel presented appropriate evidence and argument for the court to consider in mitigation of punishment. Yaites's appellate counsel notes that Yaites failed to preserve any complaint that his sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. See Steadman v. State, 160 S.W.3d 582, 586 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005, pet. ref'd). Our independent review of the record has revealed no issues of arguable merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. Counsel must advise Yaites of our decision and of his right to file a petition for discretionary review. See Sowels v. State, 45 S.W.3d 690, 694 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, no pet.).


Summaries of

Yaites v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Nov 9, 2005
No. 10-05-00074-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2005)
Case details for

Yaites v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER YAITES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Nov 9, 2005

Citations

No. 10-05-00074-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2005)