From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yahya v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1998
251 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 15, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 7, 1997, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated December 22, 1997, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated December 22, 1997, is reversed insofar as appealed from, the order dated July 7, 1997, is vacated, and the defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs awarded one bill of costs.

In opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment, the injured plaintiffs, Azhar Yahya and Adrienne Ranasinghe, submitted affidavits prepared by Dr. Donald Goldman which were based on examinations of the injured plaintiffs which he had made approximately two months earlier. The affidavits indicated that Mr. Yahya experienced a restriction of movement to 30-35 degrees with regard to right rotation and left rotation of his cervical spine and that Ms. Ranasinghe experienced a restriction of movement to 40 degrees with regard to her lumbar spine. The affidavits were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the injured plaintiffs sustained "significant limitation of use of a body function or system" (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; see also, Pareti v. Giglietta, 221 A.D.2d 607).

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Yahya v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1998
251 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Yahya v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:AZHAR YAHYA et al., Appellants, v. HERMAN SCHWARTZ et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
674 N.Y.S.2d 430

Citing Cases

Vitale v. Lev Express Cab Corp.

The affirmation also stated that the restrictions were permanent in nature. The affirmation was sufficient to…

Runkel v. Mike Ryan Tree Service, Inc.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In opposition to the defendants'…