From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 6, 1952
199 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 11475.

November 6, 1952.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee; Marion Speed Boyd, Judge.

Taylor Taylor, Memphis, Tenn. for appellant.

Canada, Russell Turner, Memphis, Tenn. for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


This cause was again heard on October 22, 1952, on oral argument in response to the application of appellant for the reason that his attorney had failed to receive notice shown by records in the Clerk's office to have been mailed to the attorneys that the cause would be heard on October 8, 1952, at which time only counsel for the appellee appeared; and, after considering the oral arguments earnestly advanced by appellant's attorney, this court being still of the opinion that this action for declaratory judgment does not present a justiciable controversy within the scope of the Declaratory Judgment Act. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202. See Angell v. Schram, 6 Cir., 109 F.2d 380, opinion by Judge Hamilton; Cf. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Hawarth, 300 U.S. 227, 57 S.Ct. 461, 81 L.Ed. 617, 108 A.L.R. 1000, adheres to its order of affirmance heretofore entered on October 14, 1952, 199 F.2d 957.


Summaries of

Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 6, 1952
199 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Leo WURTZBURGER, Appellant, v. PLOUGH, Inc., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 6, 1952

Citations

199 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1952)