From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wrynn v. Subaru Town Motors

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 18, 1984
126 Misc. 2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)

Opinion

October 18, 1984

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, Herbert Kramer, J.

Dublirer, Haydon, Straci Victor ( Beatrice H. Salten-Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Phyllis Wrynn, respondent pro se.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

Upon the record presented, the plaintiff failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence any negligence on the part of the defendant. Plaintiff did not demonstrate the absence of reasonable care in ascertaining the defect in the vehicle so as to render defendant liable for its employee's alleged negligent misrepresentation ( see, White v Guarente, 43 N.Y.2d 356, 362-363; 24 N.Y. Jur, Fraud and Deceit, § 153; 6B Warren, New York Negligence, Misrepresentation of Facts § 3.01).

PINO, P.J., HIRSCH and JONES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wrynn v. Subaru Town Motors

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 18, 1984
126 Misc. 2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)
Case details for

Wrynn v. Subaru Town Motors

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS WRYNN, Respondent, v. SUBARU TOWN MOTORS, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1984

Citations

126 Misc. 2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)
487 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

Paraflon Invs. v. Fullbridge, Inc.

Under New York law, a plaintiff alleging negligent misrepresentation must prove by preponderant evidence that…