holding that the charging of multiple crimes for multiple victims did not violate double jeopardy principles in that case
Summary of this case from Chandler v. StateNo. 584, 2009.
May 10, 2010.
Superior (Sussex) Cr 0507022890.
Decisions without Published Opinions. AFFIRMED.
holding that the charging of multiple crimes for multiple victims did not violate double jeopardy principles in that case
Summary of this case from Chandler v. Statefinding no merger issue where the same conduct—shooting into a crowd—led to the defendant's first-degree reckless endangering conviction of one victim and second-degree murder conviction of another victim
Summary of this case from Cooper v. StateFull title:Wright v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: May 10, 2010
In December 2006, a Delaware Superior Court jury convicted Petitioner of second degree murder, first degree…
Wright v. StateWright raised the same claim regarding the validity of his Conspiracy in the Second Degree conviction in a…