Opinion
May 10, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs' action was properly dismissed because they failed to demonstrate that the City of New York had written notice of the alleged sidewalk defect on which the plaintiff fell, or that some exception to this requirement applied ( see, Administrative Code § 7-201 [c] [2]; see also, Shaw v. City of Auburn, 59 N.Y.2d 780; Villaret v. City of New York, 236 A.D.2d 216; see also, Waters v. Town of Hempstead, 166 A.D.2d 584; Meltzer v. City of New York, 156 A.D.2d 124).
Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.