From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worwa v. Vann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

September 27 1996.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Before: Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant's liability for striking and injuring plaintiff Patricia Worma. We reject the contention that defendant may not be held liable in negligence for conduct allegedly resulting from his withdrawal from prescription drugs ( see, Williams v Hays, 143 NY 442; Mochen v State of New York, 43 AD2d 484, 485-486). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Worwa v. Vann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Worwa v. Vann

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA WORWA et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE VANN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
647 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

In re Maloy

As ably argued and briefed by counsel for the Petitioner (and reproduced here), there is ample precedent in…

In re Maloy

As ably argued and briefed by counsel for the Petitioner (and reproduced here), there is ample precedent in…