From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Workman v. Perry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 26, 2018
No. 18-6678 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6678

10-26-2018

OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT PERRY, Investigator; JAMES P. WALSH, Lawyer, Defendants - Appellees.

Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:17-cv-03416-RBH) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Perry, No. 6:17-cv-03416-RBH (D.S.C. June 1, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Workman v. Perry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 26, 2018
No. 18-6678 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Workman v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT PERRY, Investigator…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 26, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6678 (4th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)