From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Work. Comp. Appeal Bd. v. the Budd Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 14, 1977
29 Pa. Commw. 249 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1977)

Opinion

Submitted on briefs, February 4, 1977.

March 14, 1977.

Workmen's compensation — Timeliness of appeal — The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, Act 1915, June 2, P.L. 736 — Mailing — Jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

1. The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, Act 1915, June 2, P.L. 736, requires that appeals from action of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board be filed within twenty days after notice of the Board action has been served on such party, and the appeal period begins to run on the date the Board's order is mailed. [250-1]

2. A party filing an appeal by mail from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board must mail the appeal within twenty days of the date that notice of the Board's decision was mailed to such party. [251]

3. The failure to file a timely appeal goes to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and can be raised sua sponte. [251]

Judges CRUMLISH, JR., WILKINSON, JR. and MENCER, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 1115 C.D. 1976, from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in case of Louis J. Braun v. The Budd Company, No. A-71193.

Petition with the Department of Labor and Industry for workmen's compensation benefits. Benefits awarded. Employer appealed to the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board. Award affirmed. Employer appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Appeal quashed.

Kirk T. Karaszkiewicz, with him Montgomery, McCracken, Walker Rhoads, for appellant.

Albert Ring, with him D'Agui Del Collo, and James N. Diefenderfer, for appellees.


This appeal has been taken by The Budd Company (employer) from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee's award of benefits to Louis J. Braun (claimant) for disfigurement for 11 weeks at the rate of $114 per week and for 4 weeks at the rate of $171 per week. The employer has argued that the award was excessive and that, since the award was for disfigurement, the referee and Board improperly considered a fractured tooth which had been repaired. Since our reading of the record indicates that the employer's appeal to this Court was not timely, we do not reach these questions in quashing the appeal sua sponte.

Section 427 of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act (Act) provides: "Such appeal must in all cases be brought within twenty days after notice of the action of the board has been served upon such party, unless the Commonwealth Court, shall, upon cause shown, extend the time herein provided for taking the appeal." In measuring the 20 days, the date of the mailing of the Board's order will begin the period, and the appellant must mail his appeal within 20 days of that date to be timely. General v. E. Roseman Co., 461 Pa. 284, 336 A.2d 287 (1975), rev'g 10 Pa. Commw. 569, 312 A.2d 609 (1973); Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Johnson, 20 Pa. Commw. 231, 341 A.2d 539 (1975). Here, the Board's order was mailed on May 27, 1976. by counting May 28 as the first day, the last day for mailing a timely appeal was Thursday, June 16, 1976. However, the employer's appeal was both notarized and postmarked June 17, 1976 and was therefore untimely.

Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P. S. § 873.

The 30-day period in Section 502 of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, Act of July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.502, is not applicable here, since the Legislature reenacted the 20-day period when it amended Section 427 by Section 3 of the Act of February 8, 1972, P.L. 25. Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C.S. § 1936. Similarly, the current 30-day period in Pa. R.A.P. 1512 is not applicable since the dates in question precede July 1, 1976, the effective date of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Section 406 of the Act, 77 P. S. § 717.

Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C.S. § 1908.

Since the failure to bring a timely appeal is a jurisdictional matter, it may be raised sua sponte and precludes us from reaching the merits. Commonwealth v. Yorktowne Paper Mills, Inc., 419 Pa. 363, 214 A.2d 203 (1965). Therefore, we make the following

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 1977, the appeal of The Budd Company from the order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board dated May 11, 1976, is quashed.


Summaries of

Work. Comp. Appeal Bd. v. the Budd Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 14, 1977
29 Pa. Commw. 249 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1977)
Case details for

Work. Comp. Appeal Bd. v. the Budd Co.

Case Details

Full title:Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board and Louis J. Braun v. The Budd…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 14, 1977

Citations

29 Pa. Commw. 249 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1977)
370 A.2d 757

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Birk

It is well settled that an untimely appeal to this court deprives the court of jurisdiction to entertain the…

Sellers v. W.C.A.B

If an appeal is untimely, the Board does not have jurisdiction to reach the merits. Pittsburgh Moose Lodge #…