From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooster Group, Inc. v. Schechner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1992
183 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 14, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.).


In this action for specific performance, the court granted plaintiff summary judgment acknowledging plaintiff's rights in certain shares of stock and a proprietary lease but required that said shares and lease be held in escrow by plaintiff's attorney pending resolution of defendant's counterclaim. However, defendant did not request or demonstrate the requirements necessary for prejudgment attachment (CPLR 6201; see, Werner v Werner, 101 Misc.2d 414, 419-420). Nor did defendant request or show entitlement to a preliminary injunction (CPLR 6301), especially where, as here, defendant "can obtain adequate compensation by invoking the legal damage remedy" (Poling Transp. Corp. v. A P Tanker Corp., 84 A.D.2d 796, 797).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Wooster Group, Inc. v. Schechner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1992
183 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Wooster Group, Inc. v. Schechner

Case Details

Full title:WOOSTER GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. RICHARD SCHECHNER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 14, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 431

Citing Cases

Riccelli Enters., Inc. v. State Workers' Comp. Bd.

Ths first of these is that an application for a stay pursuant to CPLR §7805, particularly the type of…