From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 28, 2001
787 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 2D00-4518.

Opinion filed February 28, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P.9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge.


Antwan Woodson a/k/a Antwan Hall appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), which alleged that he is entitled to additional gain time pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). The trial court found that Woodson was not entitled to be resentenced because his sentence was not a departure from the 1994 guidelines.

We affirm the trial court's order for a different reason. Although the trial court failed to address Woodson's claim that he is entitled to additional gain time, Woodson must first exhaust administrative remedies through the Department of Corrections. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). If Woodson is not satisfied with the ruling of the department, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate circuit court. See Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Woodson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 28, 2001
787 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Woodson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTWAN WOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 28, 2001

Citations

787 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)