From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodson-Kenon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 22, 2007
963 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D07-1718.

August 22, 2007.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Stanton S. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-8963 CF10A.

Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed. See § 985.233(4)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2001) (youthful offender sentence is discretionary); § 985.233(4)(a)4., Fla. Stat. (2001) (imposing adult sanctions instead of youthful offender sanction "is presumed appropriate, and the court is not required to set forth specific findings or enumerate the criteria in this subsection as any basis for its decision to impose adult sanctions"); see also Lee v. State, 679 So.2d 1158, 1160 (Fla. 1996) ("[B]ecause the judge possessed the discretion to refuse to classify [defendant] as a youthful offender even if he had considered section 958.04, his failure to consider the statute does not make the sentence `illegal' under our interpretation of that term. . . . Thus, a rule 3.800(a) motion is not proper here.").

STONE, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Woodson-Kenon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 22, 2007
963 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Woodson-Kenon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Benjamin WOODSON-KENON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 22, 2007

Citations

963 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. Ford

. . ."); accord § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (requiring a "written statement . . . delineating the…