From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Johnson

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 4, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv761-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv761-MHT (WO)

11-04-2016

JAMES AMAR WOODS, Plaintiff, v. MARK JOHNSON, Defendant.


OPINION

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, an inmate, filed this lawsuit seeking injunctive and declaratory relief to stop the defendant--who currently serves as the district attorney of Houston County but represented plaintiff prior to becoming a prosecutor--from prosecuting plaintiff. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's claims against the defendant district attorney be dismissed with prejudice on the basis of absolute prosecutorial immunity, that plaintiffs' claims for declaratory and injunctive relief be dismissed without prejudice, and that his motion for preliminary injunction be denied. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted, except that all claims will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 4th day of November, 2016.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Woods v. Johnson

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 4, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv761-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Woods v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES AMAR WOODS, Plaintiff, v. MARK JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 4, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 1:16cv761-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2016)