From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 30, 2022
2:20-cv-04474-AB (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-04474-AB (MAA)

03-30-2022

PETER WOODS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the briefs and documents filed in support of and in opposition to County of Los Angeles's Motion to Quash Service Re: Lance Willison (ECF No. 71), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Request for Evidentiary Ruling is DENIED.

3. County of Los Angeles's Motion to Quash Service Re: Lance Willison is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing.


Summaries of

Woods v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 30, 2022
2:20-cv-04474-AB (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Woods v. Cnty. of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:PETER WOODS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-04474-AB (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2022)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Portland Pub. Sch. Dist.

, federal courts only allow litigants to assert their own legal rights and interests, not the legal rights…

Hernandez v. Cnty. of Fresno

Moreover, the County cannot move to dismiss a cause of action directed solely to the individual Defendants.…