From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 1986
119 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 8, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard W. Wallach, J.).


We agree with Special Term's central determination, for the reasons set forth in its opinion, that the defendants-respondents validly denied a veteran's credit to plaintiffs under the circumstances described, that this determination was in accordance with, and required by, N.Y. Constitution, article V, § 6, and that N.Y. Constitution, article V, § 6 did not violate Federal constitutional law to the extent to which it was interpreted as requiring denial of veteran's credit to plaintiffs who were not State residents at the time the relevant civil service list was established.

As to Special Term's further determination that article V, § 6 was null and void and in violation of Federal constitutional law to the extent to which it required New York State residence of an applicant at the time of the applicant's induction into the Armed Services as a condition for awarding veteran's bonus points, we note that this question was not in issue in the action. Accordingly, we modify only to delete this part of the judgment in accordance with the familiar principle that constitutional issues should not be addressed where there is no need to do so.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Asch, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ. [ 129 Misc.2d 851.]


Summaries of

Woods v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 1986
119 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Woods v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW WOODS et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Woods v. City of New York

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Christopher Keith Hall, O. Peter Sherwood and Lawrence S. Kahn of counsel),…

Winkler v. Spinnato

The court further stated that the State powers entrusted to lawyers did not "`involve matters of state policy…