Opinion
April, 1923.
Present — Kelly, P.J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Woodhull v. Holmes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Summaries of
Woodhull v. Holmes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for
Woodhull v. Holmes
Case Details
Full title:HERBERT C. WOODHULL, Respondent, v. KENNETH HOLMES, Appellant, Impleaded…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Apr 1, 1923
Citations
206 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Citing Cases
Marine v. Peyser
"The affirmative is with the plaintiff in an action upon such a note to prove a clear legal title, valid as…
Fuller v. HutchingsThe reason of this rule is obvious: the plaintiff has it in his power to show how he received it, and what he…