From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 10, 2017
Case No. 3:17-cv-215 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-215

10-10-2017

SHAWN DWAYNE WOOD, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, London Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 9), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. October 10, 2017.

/s/_________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wood v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 10, 2017
Case No. 3:17-cv-215 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 2017)
Case details for

Wood v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN DWAYNE WOOD, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, London Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 10, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-215 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 2017)