From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Hacker

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 28, 1929
121 So. 441 (Ala. 1929)

Opinion

6 Div. 289.

March 28, 1929.

Matt H. Murphy and W. Marvin Woodall, both of Birmingham, for petitioner.

David J. Davis, of Birmingham, opposed.


Under the rule obtaining in such cases we are unable to review the questions of fact presented by the petition for certiorari. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. We may add that the record of the Court of Appeals has been read, and we find in it nothing to cause regret that the rule of this court in the matter of review by certiorari is as it is.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wood v. Hacker

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 28, 1929
121 So. 441 (Ala. 1929)
Case details for

Wood v. Hacker

Case Details

Full title:WOOD v. HACKER

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 28, 1929

Citations

121 So. 441 (Ala. 1929)
219 Ala. 139

Citing Cases

Wood v. Hacker

Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Wood v. Hacker, 219 Ala. 139, 121 So. 441. The fifth count of…

Terry v. State

We will not therefore review this question, which involves a finding of fact on the part of the court.…