From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolusky v. N. NH Corr. Facility

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Dec 13, 2022
22-cv-345-SE (D.N.H. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-345-SE

12-13-2022

Tristan Wolusky v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden

Tristan Wolusky, pro se


Tristan Wolusky, pro se

ORDER

Samantha D. Elliott, United States District Judge

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated November 14, 2022 (doc. no. 5). For the reasons explained therein, Wolusky's Claim 1(b) is denied and dismissed from the petition.

“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Wolusky v. N. NH Corr. Facility

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Dec 13, 2022
22-cv-345-SE (D.N.H. Dec. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Wolusky v. N. NH Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:Tristan Wolusky v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

22-cv-345-SE (D.N.H. Dec. 13, 2022)