From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolder v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 20, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-110 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-110

11-20-2019

ELIZABETH WOLDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 17); (2) REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DETERMINATION; (3) REMANDING THIS CASE UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C.§ 405(G) TO DETERMINE PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY ONSET DATE AND FOR AN IMMEDIATE AWARD OF BENEFITS; (4) DENYING THE COMMISSIONER'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. 12) AS MOOT; AND (5) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 17), to whom this case was referred under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation (doc. 17) is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) the ALJ's non-disability determination is REVERSED; (3) this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to determine Plaintiff's disability onset date and for an immediate award of benefits; (4) DENYING AS MOOT the Commissioner's motion to remand (doc. 12); and (5) this case is TERMINATED on the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: November 20, 2019

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wolder v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 20, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-110 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Wolder v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH WOLDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 20, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-110 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2019)

Citing Cases

Mills v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

The ALJ must meaningfully explain why certain limitations are not included in the residual functional…