From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W.L. Sutphin Realty Company v. Breinig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

May, 1923.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate notice of examination denied, with ten dollars costs. We think plaintiff is entitled to the examination sought. The defendant having stipulated on two occasions to adjourn the examination without reserving any right to question the propriety or regularity of the notice, clearly waived all objections to such examination, and is estopped from moving to vacate the notice ( Schweinburg v. Altman, 131 App. Div. 795. ) Notice of examination modified so as to make it returnable before the Supreme Court at Special Term, New York county. Kelly, P.J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

W.L. Sutphin Realty Company v. Breinig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

W.L. Sutphin Realty Company v. Breinig

Case Details

Full title:W.L. SUTPHIN REALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. DAVID E. BREINIG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1923

Citations

206 App. Div. 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Citing Cases

Mossew v. to Market, Inc.

By custom and practice, adjournments of examinations before trial, like extensions of time to serve answers,…

Lubicz v. Rosen

Defendants failed to reserve their rights to object to the notice of examination. Two adjournments were…