From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wittenberg v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1988
532 N.E.2d 1285 (N.Y. 1988)

Opinion

Argued October 12, 1988

Decided November 22, 1988

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, David Saxe, J.

Kenneth K. Fisher and Michael J. Vollbrecht for appellants.

Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Dana Martine Robbins and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondents.


Appeal taken as of right dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Plaintiffs' application for leave to appeal granted. Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division ( 135 A.D.2d 132; see also, Matter of Replan Dev. v Department of Hous. Preservation Dev., 70 N.Y.2d 451).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Wittenberg v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1988
532 N.E.2d 1285 (N.Y. 1988)
Case details for

Wittenberg v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE WITTENBERG et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1988

Citations

532 N.E.2d 1285 (N.Y. 1988)
532 N.E.2d 1285
536 N.Y.S.2d 57

Citing Cases

Vast Goed v. Tax Commission

As indicated, the parties have agreed that petitioners were contractually obligated to sell the Brefries…

Saratoga Water v. Water Auth

We cannot agree with petitioners' arguments. A statute, which is presumed to be constitutional, must be…