From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingo v. Mueller

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jan 26, 2009
No. 4:09-CV-88 CAS (E.D. Mo. Jan. 26, 2009)

Opinion

No. 4:09-CV-88 CAS.

January 26, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on petitioner's pretrial petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petition will be summarily dismissed.

Petitioner is a pretrial detainee at the St. Louis County Justice Center awaiting trial for first degree robbery. Petitioner claims that he previously demanded that the Court set the case for trial within 180 days pursuant to the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 217.460 (the "UMDDL"). Petitioner says that the state has failed to try his case within the time mandated by the UMDDL, and he requests that this Court compel the state courts to comply with the UMDDL. The petition contains no other ground for relief.

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts provides that a district court shall summarily dismiss a habeas petition if it plainly appears that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. Rule 4 applies to habeas petitions arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.

"The question of whether the state violated its own speedy trial statute is a matter for the state courts" and is not cognizable on federal habeas review. Matthews v. Lockhart, 726 F.2d 394, 396 (8th Cir. 1984). As a result, the Court will summarily dismiss the petition.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 2]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

An Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.


Summaries of

Wingo v. Mueller

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jan 26, 2009
No. 4:09-CV-88 CAS (E.D. Mo. Jan. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Wingo v. Mueller

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE J. WINGO, Petitioner, v. ROY MUELLER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 26, 2009

Citations

No. 4:09-CV-88 CAS (E.D. Mo. Jan. 26, 2009)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Bowersox

Without more, a claim that Missouri officials violated the UMDDL "is not cognizable in habeas and does not…

Moore v. Steele

Without more, a claim that Missouri officials violated the UMDDL "is not cognizable in habeas and does not…