From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingfield v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 21, 1966
422 P.2d 229 (Okla. Crim. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. A-14135.

December 21, 1966.

Billy Jack Wingfield, petitioner, pro se.

Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, Hugh H. Collum, First Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter comes on application of Billy Jack Wingfield for a writ of habeas corpus discharging him from custody in the State Penitentiary, where he is currently confined under authority of a judgment and sentence rendered against him in the District Court of Tulsa County, case No. 18978. The Court having examined the petition and time computation and the Response filed on behalf of the State, and being of the opinion that petitioner is not entitled to credit for time served in federal custody, finds that the allegations of petitioner are wholly insufficient to support his assertion that he has completed service of the sentence imposed in the District Court of Tulsa County, case No. 18978.

It is therefore the order of the Court that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby, denied, and the application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wingfield v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 21, 1966
422 P.2d 229 (Okla. Crim. App. 1966)
Case details for

Wingfield v. Page

Case Details

Full title:BILLY JACK WINGFIELD, PETITIONER, v. RAY PAGE, WARDEN, STATE PENITENTIARY…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 21, 1966

Citations

422 P.2d 229 (Okla. Crim. App. 1966)
1966 OK CR 166

Citing Cases

State v. Prevost

See, Umphenour v. State, 535 S.W.2d 579 (Mo.App., 1976); Trigg v. State, 523 S.W.2d 375 (Tenn.Cr.App., 1975).…

Brooks v. State

See Bruner v. State, 398 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Watson v. State, 340 So.2d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976),…