From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wing-Miliken v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 30, 2013
111 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 3D11–1696.

2013-01-30

Thomas WING–MILIKEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Stacy D. Glick, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lunar Claire Alvey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Stacy D. Glick, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lunar Claire Alvey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

, J.

We reverse the trial court's modification of the defendant's sentence following a violation of furlough proceeding, during which the defendant was not afforded an opportunity to explain his failure to appear. On remand, the trial court must allow the defendant an opportunity to explain why he failed to appear. See Fulton v. State, 66 So.3d 950, 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Wing-Miliken v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 30, 2013
111 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Wing-Miliken v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas WING–MILIKEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

111 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)