From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winer v. Winer

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 23, 1969
254 N.E.2d 257 (Mass. 1969)

Opinion

December 23, 1969.

Jacob Y. Young for the respondent.

Paul R. Sugarman for the petitioner.


The husband appeals solely from that part of the separate support decree which awarded the wife certain specific sums and thereafter weekly support payments. The probate judge filed a report of material facts and the evidence is reported. We do not think it necessary to detail or summarize the facts or to discuss the specific contentions of the husband. The legal principles governing this case do not require repetition. Coe v. Coe, 313 Mass. 232, 235. Jasper v. Jasper, 333 Mass. 223. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the findings of the judge are supported by the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the award.

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

Winer v. Winer

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 23, 1969
254 N.E.2d 257 (Mass. 1969)
Case details for

Winer v. Winer

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARIE WINER vs. SOLOMON G. WINER

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Dec 23, 1969

Citations

254 N.E.2d 257 (Mass. 1969)
254 N.E.2d 257

Citing Cases

Gould v. Gould

The principles for determining the amount to be allowed are stated in Coe v. Coe, 313 Mass. 232, 235-236, and…