From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windham v. City of Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:11CV152 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:11CV152

06-29-2012

STEVE WINDHAM d/b/a Windham Co. v. CITY OF CENTER, TEXAS, et al.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contain her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this case has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (document #12 ) recommends that the Motion to Dismiss (document #11 ) be granted and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). No written objections have been filed. The Court therefore adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court.

In light of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the the Motion to Dismiss (document #11) is GRANTED and the above-complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.

_________________________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Windham v. City of Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:11CV152 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Windham v. City of Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:STEVE WINDHAM d/b/a Windham Co. v. CITY OF CENTER, TEXAS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:11CV152 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Fields v. Lackey

Fields's conclusory allegations are insufficient to overcome a qualified immunity defense. See Windham v.…