From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
May 11, 2018
Case No. 4:17-cv-00229-AGF (E.D. Mo. May. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 4:17-cv-00229-AGF

05-11-2018

DAVID E. WILSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER AND JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner David E. Wilson's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court has reviewed the Government's Objections to the Resentencing Report, filed on May 9, 2018 in Petitioner's criminal case, 4:03-cr-00552-AGF (ECF No. 123). In its Objections, the Government agrees that, pursuant to the en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Naylor, No. 16-2047 ("Naylor"), Petitioner no longer qualifies as an Armed Career Criminal. But the Government preserves its procedural objection that Petitioner is not entitled to successive habeas relief because his claims are not truly based on Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), and are instead based on Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016). As the Government concedes, judges within this District have consistently rejected that argument. See, e.g., Holman v. United States, No. 4:16 CV 838 CDP, 2017 WL 2438821, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Mo. June 6, 2017).

The undersigned likewise overrules the Government's Objections and concludes that no further briefing is necessary with respect to Petitioner's §2255 motion; the Court will grant Petitioner's motion. Petitioner will be resentenced by separate order in his criminal case, and an amended judgment will be entered in that case.

The supplemental briefing schedule proposed by the parties and adopted by the Court on April 25, 2018 (ECF No. 15) is therefore vacated. --------

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that David E. Wilson's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is GRANTED. ECF No. 1.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file a copy of this Order and Judgment in Petitioner's criminal case, No. 4:03-cr-00552-AGF.

/s/_________

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 11th day of May, 2018.


Summaries of

Wilson v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
May 11, 2018
Case No. 4:17-cv-00229-AGF (E.D. Mo. May. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Wilson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. WILSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 11, 2018

Citations

Case No. 4:17-cv-00229-AGF (E.D. Mo. May. 11, 2018)