From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Oct 2, 2024
No. 1D2024-1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

1D2024-1295

10-02-2024

Richard E. Wilson, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Richard E. Wilson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Richard E. Wilson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner's motion for postconviction relief, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So.3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So.3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Oct 2, 2024
No. 1D2024-1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard E. Wilson, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

No. 1D2024-1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)