From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00733-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-00733-MCE-EFB P.

September 30, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 5, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 5, 2008, are adopted in full;
2. Respondent's January 4, 2008, motion to dismiss is granted; and,
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00733-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Wilson v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN J. WILSON, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-00733-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Bagdasaryan v. Swarthout

In the context at issue here, "[c]ourts ordinarily deem the factual predicate to have been discovered the day…