From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILSON v. ROBL

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division
Sep 18, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-00046 (W.D. Ky. Sep. 18, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-00046.

September 18, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon a motion by the Petitioner, Linda S. Wilson, objecting to the Magistrate's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations. (DN 16). In his Recommendation, the Magistrate concluded that the Court should not grant Wilson's petition for a writ of mandamus. (DN 15). Notwithstanding the Petitioner's objections, the Court agrees with the Magistrate's conclusion that the Respondent does not have a clear duty to accept and file motions in a closed bankruptcy where the filing party has not moved to reopen the case or tendered the appropriate reopening fee. For this reason, the Court hereby adopts the Magistrate's Recommendation and DENIES Wilson's petition for a writ of mandamus. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

WILSON v. ROBL

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division
Sep 18, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-00046 (W.D. Ky. Sep. 18, 2007)
Case details for

WILSON v. ROBL

Case Details

Full title:LINDA WILSON PETITIONER v. DIANE S. ROBL, Clerk, United States Bankruptcy…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-00046 (W.D. Ky. Sep. 18, 2007)

Citing Cases

Hansen v. Coleman

Further, a "[writ of] mandamus does not supersede other remedies," and it may not properly issue unless the…

Driskell v. Homosexuals

The Court is not obligated to file documents received after a case has been closed. See Miller v. Johnson,…