From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 6, 1928
264 P. 697 (Nev. 1928)

Opinion

No. 2786 (See 50 Nev. 371)

March 6, 1928.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING


In the petition for a rehearing, counsel for appellant insists earnestly that a murderer cannot inherit from his victim. We are aware of cases expressing this rule, some of which have been cited in the petition. They represent, however, a minority view, and, in our opinion, trench upon legislative power. The majority rule is to the contrary.

"The weight of authority is to the effect that, in the absence of a statute providing that murderers shall not inherit the property of their victims, the courts cannot except murderers from the operation of the statutes of descent. The theory of these cases is that the horror and repulsion caused by such an atrocity do not warrant the court in reading into a plain statutory provision an exception which the statute in no way suggests." 9 R.C.L. pp. 47, 48.

Our statutes of descent contain no such exception, and it is beyond the power of this court to supply it.

A rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 6, 1928
264 P. 697 (Nev. 1928)
Case details for

Wilson v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:WILSON v. RANDOLPH

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Mar 6, 1928

Citations

264 P. 697 (Nev. 1928)
264 P. 697

Citing Cases

Strickland v. Wysowatcky

"'* * * but such a statute must be strictly construed and in some situations is held not applicable. A…

Smith v. Greenburg

" Some of the cases that support the italicized portions of this statement include: Holloway v. McCormick, 41…