From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Ocean City

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1934
170 A. 56 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1933 —

Decided January 5, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 325.

For appellants, William Elmer Brown, Jr., Bourgeois Coulomb, Robert K. Bell and Furman A. De Maris, Jr.

For the respondents, Andrew C. Boswell and Kenneth J. Dawes.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Ocean City

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1934
170 A. 56 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Wilson v. Ocean City

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD WILSON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MAYOR, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1934

Citations

170 A. 56 (N.J. 1934)
170 A. 56

Citing Cases

McNally v. Township of Teaneck

[ Id. at 422-423] In Wilson v. Ocean City, 112 N.J.L. 97 (E. A. 1934), aff'g per curiam o.b. 11 N.J. Misc.…